Springfield School District Submits $1M Scams Suit

Springfield City School District submitted a suit in Clark County Common Pleas Court versus an Arkansas company it declares defrauded them of more than $1 million.

The board of education has taken legal action against Computer Automation System Inc., declaring it’s a good idea the company about $240,000 for it to submit the district’s, apply for alabama medicaid documentation so it would be repaid in 2011, 2012 and 2013. The district states in the match that it got a notification that the documents submitted did not have compliance with administrative policies and it would not be getting more than $900,000 it believed it would be paid.

The suit declares a breach of the agreement, unjustified enrichment, scams, and neglect. Computer system Automation System Inc. didn’t return telephone calls looking for a remark from the Springfield News-Sun.

The district uses trainee’s specific services it needs to get repaid for by the Ohio Department of Medicaid if the documents are done correctly, Springfield City Schools Treasurer Dale Miller stated.

” We need to get repaid for a few of the services we supplied to our trainees, like speech treatment,” Miller stated.

The services supplied by the schools are necessary for many of its trainees, Miller stated, and the district strives to supply their trainees what they need to prosper.

The district contracted out the work to submit the compensation kinds, he stated, and the claim competes Automation System Inc. promoted itself as a company that understood ways to submit the documents appropriately.

” They were to assist prepare all the paperwork,” Miller stated.

The claim declares a worker at the company was designated to the district but at some point, quickly after passed away suddenly. The district declares the company cannot select a brand-new worker to manage the district’s account.

” In sending such Medicaid compensation claims, (the school) trust (Computer Automation System Inc.) to make sure the claims were prepared, recorded and sent in accordance with all appropriate administrative and regulative requirements,” the claim states.

The district implicates the company in the claim of breaching its agreement because the company supposedly cannot supply the services and didn’t train, seek advice from or encourage technical help to Springfield schools. It also implicates the company of not offering correct reporting or auditing support that the arrangement needed.

The suit also implicates the company of being irresponsible, stating the company had the responsibility to “offer the services to (the school) in a skilled, workmanlike, expert and/or fairly sensible way, and/or in accordance with the requirements of care relevant to Medicaid declares administrators and specialists.”.

The school declares the company cannot do this and the school is out more than $1 million because of it.